My weblog ELECTRON BLUE, which concentrated on science and mathematics, ran from 2004-2008. It is no longer being updated. My current blog, which is more art-related, is here.

Sun, 23 Apr, 2006

Functions and causality

Enough of this arty stuff, let's get back to what is really important, that is, mathematics. I am going through the review chapter on functions and how they work. I never was completely sure about the whole thing but this chapter is a more complete and clearer re-working of the material. One thing that impresses me this time around is that functions and function notation represent a process, as calculus will, rather than simple one-time calculations as in arithmetic. One quantity is processed into another quantity: the input leads to output. x goes through function process f to become y,, hence the function notation y=f(x).

This notation is ambiguous if it points to any actual reality. Is y=f(x) a statement of causality? Does x cause y? When x changes, so does y, in a predictable way described by the function f. But is that predictable change a causal one? It looks that way, but it may not be. A function process may be abstracted from a bunch of data, so that it honestly looks like x causes the change in y. But it could very well be that the two changes are not dependent on each other but simply seem to be changing with respect to each other. The statement of a function f describes a relationship between those two quantities, but is this necessarily causal?

For instance, you could find some sort of causal relationship between unrelated phenomena which happen at the same time, and maybe even create a mathematical statement for it. You'd be right, but the causal reasoning would be wrong. Correlation is not causation, as many a teacher has told us. Mistaking correlation (occurring together) for causality (one thing making another happen) is a common form of bad thinking that may lead to everything from belief in paranormal phenomena and superstition, to what atheists consider religion to be: a mistaken perception of meaning and order in the world.

Or is it possible that there are no unrelated quantities in our world? Is there a function which defines the flutter of that now-famous butterfly's wing which causes the hurricane three thousand miles away? That's chaos theory, something my simple mathematical podging won't get to, perhaps ever. Mathematics on my level is about simplifying things, reductionism, and getting the relationship right, whether that relationship is real or not.

Posted at 3:09 am | link


Why the Title?
About the Author
What this blog is about: the first post
Email: volcannah@yahoo.com
Pyracantha Main Page

RSS Version

Archives:

November 2014 (4)
October 2014 (16)
September 2008 (5)
August 2008 (5)
July 2008 (7)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (6)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (8)
February 2008 (9)
January 2008 (8)
December 2007 (9)
November 2007 (9)
October 2007 (1)
September 2007 (7)
August 2007 (6)
July 2007 (10)
June 2007 (7)
May 2007 (10)
April 2007 (7)
March 2007 (11)
February 2007 (10)
January 2007 (6)
December 2006 (9)
November 2006 (9)
October 2006 (8)
September 2006 (8)
August 2006 (10)
July 2006 (9)
June 2006 (10)
May 2006 (10)
April 2006 (8)
March 2006 (12)
February 2006 (10)
January 2006 (11)
December 2005 (11)
November 2005 (9)
October 2005 (10)
September 2005 (10)
August 2005 (12)
July 2005 (9)
June 2005 (10)
May 2005 (8)
April 2005 (7)
March 2005 (8)
February 2005 (9)
January 2005 (7)
December 2004 (7)
November 2004 (7)
October 2004 (8)
September 2004 (5)
August 2004 (9)
July 2004 (9)
June 2004 (8)
May 2004 (6)
April 2004 (13)
March 2004 (12)
February 2004 (13)

Science

Cosmic Variance
Life as a Physicist
Cocktail Party Physics
Bad Astronomy
Asymptotia
Jennifer Saylor
Thus Spake Zuska

Listed on Blogwise