My weblog ELECTRON BLUE, which concentrated on science and mathematics, ran from 2004-2008. It is no longer being updated. My current blog, which is more art-related, is here.

Tue, 03 Aug, 2004

Significant Digits

Toiling through these long-winded logarithm problems, I find it interesting that the results I get by hand or slide rule differ by one or even two significant digits from the results that the electronic calculator gives. In order to get calculator-like results "by hand," I have to do extra sub-calculations to match up the mantissa numbers with the desired subject numbers. The process of multiplying and dividing long numbers by adding or subtracting their logarithms seems so time-consuming and involved that I wonder whether it is really a more convenient method at all. The negative logarithms are especially confusing.

The mechanical devices like slide rules and calculators are so much of an advance on the pencil-pushing use of tables and interpolations that it reminds me of something I once heard concerning the history of science and technology. Only when mathematicians and scientists could gain a reasonable level of accuracy in calculating things like logarithms, could science and engineering progress forward. The measurements that lead to scientific discoveries or technical inventions, despite all those banks of computing girls doing the work by hand, need far more accuracy than mistake-prone hand calculation can do. And of course nowadays, the level of measurement and accuracy is so incredibly high that only electronic devices of vast and ponderous power can crank out the results.

One of my Friendly Scientists assures me that I have actually done more physics than I thought, and a quick review through one of my physics texts would send me on my way into the next "semester's" work. But it's still a long way from where I am, to the time when I will be formally introduced, that is, mathematically introduced, to atoms and the world of subatomic particles, let alone energy and space-time. I am still in the eighteenth century scientifically and mathematically, though in the nineteen-fifties technologically. To use a musical analogy, I'm listening to a peculiar combination of Bach and Elvis.

Posted at 2:43 am | link


Why the Title?
About the Author
What this blog is about: the first post
Email: volcannah@yahoo.com
Pyracantha Main Page

RSS Version

Archives:

November 2014 (4)
October 2014 (16)
September 2008 (5)
August 2008 (5)
July 2008 (7)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (6)
April 2008 (5)
March 2008 (8)
February 2008 (9)
January 2008 (8)
December 2007 (9)
November 2007 (9)
October 2007 (1)
September 2007 (7)
August 2007 (6)
July 2007 (10)
June 2007 (7)
May 2007 (10)
April 2007 (7)
March 2007 (11)
February 2007 (10)
January 2007 (6)
December 2006 (9)
November 2006 (9)
October 2006 (8)
September 2006 (8)
August 2006 (10)
July 2006 (9)
June 2006 (10)
May 2006 (10)
April 2006 (8)
March 2006 (12)
February 2006 (10)
January 2006 (11)
December 2005 (11)
November 2005 (9)
October 2005 (10)
September 2005 (10)
August 2005 (12)
July 2005 (9)
June 2005 (10)
May 2005 (8)
April 2005 (7)
March 2005 (8)
February 2005 (9)
January 2005 (7)
December 2004 (7)
November 2004 (7)
October 2004 (8)
September 2004 (5)
August 2004 (9)
July 2004 (9)
June 2004 (8)
May 2004 (6)
April 2004 (13)
March 2004 (12)
February 2004 (13)

Science

Cosmic Variance
Life as a Physicist
Cocktail Party Physics
Bad Astronomy
Asymptotia
Jennifer Saylor
Thus Spake Zuska

Listed on Blogwise